The latest Bollywood sensation, ‘Animal,’ featuring stellar performances by Ranbir Kapoor, Rashmika Mandanna, and Anil Kapoor, has found itself at the center of heated discussions and harsh criticisms from various online communities. Director Sandeep Reddy Vanga, known for his provocative filmmaking style, is no stranger to controversy. His latest creation has once again ignited a storm, not only for its storyline but also for scenes that have been deemed toxic, raising questions about the portrayal of relationships and gender dynamics in the film industry.
Toxicity Unveiled:
One of the scenes in ‘Animal’ that has drawn vehement criticism involves Ranbir Kapoor’s character demanding an unusual display of affection from Rashmika Mandanna’s character, Zoya Riaz. In a disturbing turn, Zoya is asked to lick the protagonist’s shoe as a supposed sign of her love. This scene has sparked outrage for its potentially degrading depiction of women and the normalization of demeaning behavior within romantic relationships.
Adding fuel to the controversy, a scene unfolds where a young Ranbir Kapoor enters his sister’s college carrying a gun. The gun-wielding entrance is portrayed as a warning to those who may have harassed his sister. This dramatic sequence has raised concerns about the film’s approach to addressing sensitive issues, with some arguing that it perpetuates a culture of violence and aggression as a means of asserting control and protection.
The “Pad Change” Dialogue:
Another scene that has fueled the controversy involves a dialogue about menstruation. Vijay, portrayed by Ranbir Kapoor, becomes enraged with Geetanjali (Rashmika Mandanna) for discussing her period. The dialogue, “You change four pads a month and create drama over it, here I am changing 50 in a day,” has faced criticism for its insensitivity and reinforcement of gender stereotypes surrounding menstruation.
Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s Controversial Streak:
Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s filmmaking approach has consistently been a source of controversy. Known for pushing boundaries and openly defending contentious themes, the director has become a lightning rod for discussions about the responsibility of filmmakers in depicting sensitive subjects. Whether it’s his defense of violence in romantic relationships or the backlash he faces for alleged misogyny and toxic masculinity in his films, Vanga is no stranger to the spotlight.
The Backlash:
The backlash against ‘Animal’ has been swift and intense, with social media platforms serving as the battleground for discussions about the film’s problematic scenes. Critics argue that filmmakers, particularly those with substantial influence, should exercise caution when portraying sensitive topics to avoid inadvertently normalizing harmful behavior or perpetuating harmful stereotypes.
The Counterargument:
Amidst the criticism, some argue in favor of the freedom of artistic expression. Supporters contend that Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s work, by delving into the darker aspects of human relationships, sparks important conversations about societal norms and expectations. They suggest that the film may serve as a reflection of reality rather than an endorsement of problematic behavior.
